You guys were right, WB did end up ruining the Arkham Franchise. Say NO to prequel

[cmdharris]

No. Dick Grayson was introduced as Robin in 1940, the year after Batman made his debut in comics. The Silver Age officially began in 1956, more then a decade later. Also, Death in the Family and The Killing Joke happened in 1988 during the Modern Age. Just shy of the Bronze Age actually.

Hang on then that means itll be robin in speedos and batmn in blue. Unless they follow the new 52 thing of the stories only going back 5 years and the tone will still be dark

[Darkicity]

Hang on then that means itll be robin in speedos and batmn in blue. Unless they follow the new 52 thing of the stories only going back 5 years and the tone will still be dark

maybe they will do the new 52 thing seeing as it's popular right now

[cmdharris]

maybe they will do the new 52 thing seeing as it's popular right now

I'm a fan of the relaunch continuity to be honest. I like Jason Todd as an anti hero and I like Barbara Gordon back walking yet still crippled emotionally. Also it makes sense that dick was made robin at 16 and not 12. Any thoughts?

[Matches_Malone]

I'm a fan of the relaunch continuity to be honest. I like Jason Todd as an anti hero and I like Barbara Gordon back walking yet still crippled emotionally. Also it makes sense that dick was made robin at 16 and not 12. Any thoughts?

I'd love it if they drew inspiration from the New 52, would love to have the New 52 Batsuit. Incorporating the new villains would be great too; Court of Owls, Morgan Ducard (Nobody) etc...

[sintzu1]

Also it makes sense that dick was made robin at 16 and not 12. Any thoughts?

wich book says that ? cause i just read the batman vol 1 till now

[Goldenfoxx]

Add my name to the list of people who just don't want to see a 50's era Justice League game before the next Arkham game. And while I don't wish to jump to conclusions, waiting around until there's an official announcement is to wait too late to be heard. Once the deal is greenlit and underway, all the hooping and hollering from the fans and forum members won't mean a thing. I do think that anyone who is opposed to this direction should speak up now and be heard rather than wait.

[sintzu1]

Add my name to the list of people who just don't want to see a 50's era Justice League game before the next Arkham game. And while I don't wish to jump to conclusions, waiting around until there's an official announcement is to wait too late to be heard. Once the deal is greenlit and underway, all the hooping and hollering from the fans and forum members won't mean a thing. I do think that anyone who is opposed to this direction should speak up now and be heard rather than wait.

its not a 50s era game just the story that there using was told in the 50s and the game will take place in the arkham timeline

[TheCapedCrusader]

wich book says that ? cause i just read the batman vol 1 till now

Dick being 12 when he first became Robin is a product of the Modern Age. Before he was 8, just like Bruce was when he lost his parents. New52 kinda screws with the timeline.

[oxidious]

Once again, I say, Who cares...it's like this... Iron Man 1 came out, Iron Man 2 came out. People wanted to see Iron Man 3 but got avengers instead. Avengers was an amazing movie, and now we still get Iron Man 3. Same thing will happen with Arkham ok people. The next game will be fine and then arkham 3 will be even better im sure. If the rumours are true then you know you're going to buy it anyways.

[MontyPython]

I would compare it to Assassin's Creed.