Game of the Year and Harley Quinn's Revenge FAQ

[RedDragon2570]

His opinion, let him have it.

He's more than welcome to his opinion. It was the BAM that was unnecessary. But I hear ya.

But did you really need to say that? If you were so mature you would have just shrugged it off. Guess not though right? ^_^

Yes I did to get my "opinion" across. Now I will shrug it off and leave the thread for questions and answers like its suppose to be. Not smart _ comments.

[Spiderhog]

Correct me if i am wrong:
All DLC will be included without any interenet connection required. (Harley Quinn Revenge too)
The game has a 3 months delay for Europe.
Robin will not be able to free-roam in Arkham City.
Harley's Hideout will be available to explore after we defeat her.
Catwoman does not require a network pass.
If i have bought the game already my savefiles will be available in the GOTY version.

[Demonic_Clown]

That's a pretty sweet idea!

We take lessons away from all we do and there are certainly a lot to be had from the box art feedback.

Well hire me!!! I have tons of amazing ideas like that, you can pay me in swag. ^_^

[SarahMay]

Spiderhog:

All correct apart from:

We have never discussed or mentioned Harley's Hideout

[Demonic_Clown]

Yes I did to get my "opinion" across. Now I will shrug it off and leave the thread for questions and answers like its suppose to be. Not smart _ comments.

Well those are the only comments i have to give to those special people in my life. ^_^

[RedRobin]

Personally, I don't think any of the cover art's been on par with the one for Arkham Asylum. That was perfect.

It said: "Realistic Batman". Point made.

Arkham City's boxart looked too clean. Nothing going on. The cleanliness didn't really advertise what the game was all about, and certainly didn't match the game experience itself.

I didn't like the Robin edition boxart either. It just screamed "We have Robin!", but not successfully. There was no need to have Batman dangling behind him on a tightrope aside from showcasing the 3D, which wasn't really needed either. But that was GAME's marketing ploy, so I'll let that slide.

I don't like the GOTY boxart either. It looks like an attempt to cash in positive reviews to sell more copies. I looks like Batman's trying to claw his way out of the comments. It's the very show of bad advertising, filled with people screaming about how good the game is without explaining why it's so good.

If you're going for the clean look you should at least take a page out of James Dyson's book in advertising.

Better yet, revert to something closer to Arkham Asylum. I liked it, and so did many others. That's part of how this all started.

[Demonic_Clown]

Personally, I don't think any of the cover art's been on par with the one for Arkham Asylum. That was perfect.

It said: "Realistic Batman". Point made.

Arkham City's boxart looked too clean. Nothing going on. The cleanliness didn't really advertise what the game was all about, and certainly didn't match the game experience itself.

I didn't like the Robin edition boxart either. It just screamed "We have Robin!", but not successfully. There was no need to have Batman dangling behind him on a tightrope aside from showcasing the 3D, which wasn't really needed either. But that was GAME's marketing ploy, so I'll let that slide.

I don't like the GOTY boxart either. It's the very show of bad advertising, filled with people screaming about how good the game is without explaining why it's so good.

If you're going for the clean look you should at least take a page out of James Dyson's book in advertising.

Better yet, revert to something closer to Arkham Asylum. I liked it, and so did many others. That's part of how this all started.

Well I think they liked that clean white look just because they figured people knew what the game was, the knew it had batman, and they knew it was the sequel to Arkham Asylum.

[Spiderhog]

Spiderhog:

All correct apart from:

We have never discussed or mentioned Harley's Hideout

Ok.
Thanks for confirming.
Now i just need to wait 4 months...

[RedRobin]

Well I think they liked that clean white look just because they figured people knew what the game was, the knew it had batman, and they knew it was the sequel to Arkham Asylum.

True, when I first saw the original Arkham City boxart I pretty much thought they had chosen to sail on the first game's reputation alone, and I couldn't blame them. But this new one is too much.

I liked the boxart for Arkham Asylum, even if it was because they didn't bother to change the already awesome boxart from the normal version.

The new GOTY game cover stinks of a cash-in. It reeks of a lack of confidence in their game. The need to hide their game and sell the words of others rather than the game itself. I don't like it, and so do many people.

[Demonic_Clown]

True, when I first saw the original Arkham City boxart I pretty much thought they had chosen to sail on the first game's reputation alone, and I couldn't blame them. But this new one is too much.

I liked the boxart for Arkham Asylum, even if it was because they didn't bother to change the already awesome boxart from the normal version.

The GOTY game cover stinks of a cash-in. It reeks of a lack of confidence in their game. The need to hide their product and sell the words of others rather than the game itself. I don't like it, and so do many people.

I dont like the new cover art either, I made a thread just about that lol.